| |
|
|
 > Product > Logistics |
Sorter System
A partner who understands customer'srequests most accurately and reaches out first! |
|
|
|
| Sorter System |
 |
Sorter System Comparison Tablec |
|
| Section |
Sorter Type Comparison |
| Tilt tray Sorter |
Cross belt Sorter |
Reference
pictures |
 |
 |
| Drive |
• Chain C/V + Tilt tray |
• Chain C/V + Cross blet |
| Method |
• A classifying method by tilting driving tray on the rail. |
• A classifying method by driving a small belt toward the rail and 90-degree direction on the driving carrier on the rail. |
Processing
Speed |
• 4,000~12,000/hr |
• 6,000~15,000/hr |
| Characteristics |
• High reliability
• Can be applied to various products
• Can be affected by the coefficient of friction of the products.
• Possible two-way branching |
• High reliability
• Not being affected by the coefficient of friction of the products.
• Possible two-way branching
• Expensive than other types
• Each tray needs a motor |
|
|
| Section |
Sorter Type Comparison |
| Slide shoe Sorter |
Pop-up Sorter |
Reference
pictures |
 |
 |
| Drive |
• Slat C/V + Slide shoe |
• Roller C/V + Pop-up |
| Method |
• A classifying method by sliding driving shoe on the rail. |
• A classifying method by pop-up the
branching device like roller and wheel at the branch location. |
Processing
Speed |
• 4,000~10,000/hr |
• 2,000~5,000/hr |
| Characteristics |
• Suitable for packing products like boxes.
• Two-way branching is possible, but difficult to be configurable.
• None loop-type
• More noise |
• The low processing speed
• Cheaper than other types
• Suitable for packing products like boxes.
• Comparatively cheaper than other types. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
